You’ll resize a picture in less than a minute without losing the quality of the image.Posting and processing images on Facebook has been a problem for me for quite a while. Luminar is the powerful photo software that makes it easy to resize and optimize your images. Ah, Facebook, regardless of the current controversies surrounding it, it’s still one of the best ways to connect with your fans.Resize Image. Resize Facebook cover photos and crop your Facebook cover photos with Fotor, you are easy to make your own Facebook profile outstanding and catch your potential audience at their first sight.
Resize Your Photo For Facebook Profile Picture Free Template ToWith Kapwing's design tools, you can make a custom Facebook Cover image or you can resize an existing banner to crop or fit the area. The header or banner image will appear at the top of your Facebook profile. Use this free template to resize your photo or video for the Facebook Cover area to 820x312, the best size for Facebook banner images and videos.![]() ![]() However, the pre-compressed image was 20% of the full resolution original. I then downloaded each image to compare them.I found that the previously uncompressed image had been compressed by Facebook and was now just 22% of the original size. I uploaded a maximum quality image and a 70% 72DPI image to facebook on a standard group timeline. Not a chance! The image got compressed further - another 11% in fact! DON’T DOWN SAMPLE YOUR DPIIgnore all the advice about downsampling your pic to 72DPI (to prevent theft). It should have already optimised this image right? Facebook should have accepted it with open arms and done precisely nothing. I re-uploaded (is that a word?) the previously 70% compressed image to Facebook. Comparing the newly downloaded images to each other revealed that the uncompressed file was 11% larger than the pre-compressed file after Facebook had finished with them.I went even further. Remote desktop control for macThen, when Facebook gets the image, it will compress it again.When I tested this myself, I found the difference to be undetectable. This occurs in Facebook.If you export to your hard drive in JPG, well that means you have already applied one level of compression in the conversion from RAW to JPG. Facebook now converts them to JPG's on upload and then compresses them further.So while it was true that PNGs looked way better in the past, it is no longer true.The theory behind exporting as a PNG and uploading to Facebook is that there will only be one stage of compression. Leave it at 300DPI and let Facebook handle it.While it was certainly the case a while back that Facebook actually posted PNG's (they can't be compressed because they are a lossless format). More than this, they were all of an identical size - even the so-called 'high quality' image!Bottom line. When downloading the image I could see no difference whatsoever between them when pixel peeping at 100%. I uploaded my sample images to my timeline, a group timeline, my page and using 'high quality' in an album.Guess what? Each one of them treated the image identically. The downside is that PNGs are bigger and take up more space on your hard drive.DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TIMELINE, GROUPS AND PAGESThere is a lot of information about the differences of posting to Timelines, Groups, Pages and Photo Albums (on high quality).I have bought into this in the past but I decided to actually test the principles. The 6x6, the Hasselblad medium format ratio, is back - thank Instagram for that! WHAT SIZE PHOTO TO UPLOAD TO FACEBOOK?Sizing your image is tricky. You will note that your image will take up a far bigger piece of screen real estate (on phones it is called the viewport) than they did in the past.If you can't post a vertical, then at least post a square. More and more people are browsing the internet on phones and have you noticed what format the average phone is? I'll give you a hint, it's vertical.Whereas it used to be the case that verticals were shrunk into tiny pics on Facebook (because we all used computers to look at these sites) now we use smartphones and the vertical/portrait image is back with a vengeance.Sites like Pinterest & Tumblr all promote verticals and Facebook has just joined the club. The best sizes change all the time! But there has been a major trend recently. BEST CROP RATIOSSizing images for social media is always a bit of a moving goal post. 2048px (size will yield the best quality and fewest compression artefacts)So I went ahead and tested 2048px v 1080px v 960px and I got some very interesting results.When looking at the images side-by-side on the timeline I got a hint that the 2048px images were marginally better. And remember, most people will be looking at it on a tiny phone screen anyway.Facebook actually publish what they do to images.Yeah, who knew! Check the latest advice here.The current supported sizes for normal images are: The measly timeline width is all you are really going to need. The good news (or bad?) is that hardly anyone will click your image to view it full size anyway. Not so much for print, but for use on websites and as web images.I'm not sure there is much we can do about that other than to post small images that don't scale very well. ![]() Converting to sRGB on export means that they will interpret the image correctly - even though they don't know the image is sRGB.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorPhyllis ArchivesCategories |